schedule
July 17, 2012 at 12:00 AM
Morning After ?
schedule
April 6, 2008 at 12:00 AM
hey luv it ^^
schedule
December 2, 2006 at 12:00 AM
Omg!!! I love it!!! Omg omg omg omg!!!! I fucking love it dammit!!!!!!!!!!!I love teh Sasuke!!! Nyah so stfu!!!
schedule
January 10, 2006 at 12:00 AM
Not having read all the deleted reviews puts me at a disadvantage, I suppose, but it seems that whatever agenda each "Anon" has, they've not been particularly successful. If you think someone is a loser, tell them why. Endlessly repeating that the author should give up writing doesn't help anyone; neither does name calling. In fact, it puts them (and other readers) on the defensive and they're less likely to listen to anything further you have to say. If it's a problem with characterization or overused plot devices or mechanics or whatever you percieve the problem to be, say something; it will help the author become a better writer, and that way, everyone wins. If it's a matter of pairings, that's each reader's own opinion, and usually stated in the summary or in an author's note before the fic, so there's plenty of chance to avoid those you don't want to read.
Personally, I don't think SasuSaku is a plausible canon pairing, but the characters are complex and it's interesting to explore what might have happened under different circumstances; plus, this pairing hasn't been overdone as some have. I've read more than my fair share of fics in the last three and a half years, in various fandoms, from fluff to PWP, from het to yaoi to threesomes, and virtually any pairing you can think of. There's little that surprises me anymore. I like to give comments when I can, say what works and what needs work; honestly, this one is well written. Proper mechanics are important to English majors, and I generally click the "back" button if it gets under my skin. I see little to complain about in that area here. I can't argue that there's a lack of plot and characterization, since that is what I expect from a PWP. There are many fics that are less than satisfactory, and it is possible to avoid them. Fics that I see recommended by more than one person, particularly recommendations by authors I like, are ones that I'm more likely to read and enjoy, because we have the same tastes. If anyone desires further discussion, feel free to email me at bijoupoet@yahoo.com.
Personally, I don't think SasuSaku is a plausible canon pairing, but the characters are complex and it's interesting to explore what might have happened under different circumstances; plus, this pairing hasn't been overdone as some have. I've read more than my fair share of fics in the last three and a half years, in various fandoms, from fluff to PWP, from het to yaoi to threesomes, and virtually any pairing you can think of. There's little that surprises me anymore. I like to give comments when I can, say what works and what needs work; honestly, this one is well written. Proper mechanics are important to English majors, and I generally click the "back" button if it gets under my skin. I see little to complain about in that area here. I can't argue that there's a lack of plot and characterization, since that is what I expect from a PWP. There are many fics that are less than satisfactory, and it is possible to avoid them. Fics that I see recommended by more than one person, particularly recommendations by authors I like, are ones that I'm more likely to read and enjoy, because we have the same tastes. If anyone desires further discussion, feel free to email me at bijoupoet@yahoo.com.
schedule
December 31, 2005 at 12:00 AM
Oh no, I assumed you understood. Apparently sarcasm carries poorly in text.
Why would you purposfully use "Anon" when you know that previous "Anon" posts have been consistantly irritating flames? Perhaps this handle is too dear to your heart for you to abandon it, but the confusion is entirely understandable from my point of view.
Haha. You used my word against me. How cute. I was shocked I tell you, shocked, and properly chastised to change my verbose ways.
nao ill be forsed to typ liek this 4 evr ohnooooooessss!!!111!!!
Why would you purposfully use "Anon" when you know that previous "Anon" posts have been consistantly irritating flames? Perhaps this handle is too dear to your heart for you to abandon it, but the confusion is entirely understandable from my point of view.
Haha. You used my word against me. How cute. I was shocked I tell you, shocked, and properly chastised to change my verbose ways.
nao ill be forsed to typ liek this 4 evr ohnooooooessss!!!111!!!
schedule
December 31, 2005 at 12:00 AM
"And also if you were not hear from the beginning and did not see my original post and the author's subsequent response"
And what WAS the author's "subsequent response"? She deleted EVERY review/flame that had bickering in them, including the ones by "anon #1", "anon #2" and a handful of other people's reviews. YOUR FLAMES were not the only ones she had deleted.
And what WAS the author's "subsequent response"? She deleted EVERY review/flame that had bickering in them, including the ones by "anon #1", "anon #2" and a handful of other people's reviews. YOUR FLAMES were not the only ones she had deleted.
schedule
December 30, 2005 at 12:00 AM
Hmmm there seem to be two problems with your review.
1) You seem to believe that I am ignorant and cannnot understand the meaning of your review. Rest assured I know exactly what all the words mean.
2) You also seem to think that I'm the same Anon from before, you do realize that anybody and everybody who does not enter a name gets listed as Anon. They are not all the same person.:D
And also if you were not hear from the beginning and did not see my original post and the author's subsequent response then it would BEHOOVE you to shut your mouth:D Thank you
1) You seem to believe that I am ignorant and cannnot understand the meaning of your review. Rest assured I know exactly what all the words mean.
2) You also seem to think that I'm the same Anon from before, you do realize that anybody and everybody who does not enter a name gets listed as Anon. They are not all the same person.:D
And also if you were not hear from the beginning and did not see my original post and the author's subsequent response then it would BEHOOVE you to shut your mouth:D Thank you
schedule
December 28, 2005 at 12:00 AM
So sorry Anon, didn't mean to break your brain.
Here's the simple version: Don't be a dick.
The netspeak version: omg yur so meen :x
Latin: Tui caput in ano est.
Hm, I guess this is like bear baiting. Only more humane.
If you really want to prove you're a better person, why not stop rising to the occaision?
Here's the simple version: Don't be a dick.
The netspeak version: omg yur so meen :x
Latin: Tui caput in ano est.
Hm, I guess this is like bear baiting. Only more humane.
If you really want to prove you're a better person, why not stop rising to the occaision?
schedule
December 26, 2005 at 12:00 AM
Wooooo big words, go Lady D:P
schedule
December 17, 2005 at 12:00 AM
I love your fic. It's an amazing first lemon and I'd love to see more from you.
To Anon:
This personal vendetta you've embarked on is neither constructive nor mature. What you are doing is harassment and it would behoove you to find a different target rather than embarrass yourself any further.
To Anon:
This personal vendetta you've embarked on is neither constructive nor mature. What you are doing is harassment and it would behoove you to find a different target rather than embarrass yourself any further.